The following referrals were issued in IAC Session 169 which was held on 01/14/11:
1) Italian dossier from 2008 referred a male child until age 5
2) French dossier from 2008 referred a child, female, to 6 years
3) Italian dossier from 2008 referred a male child until age 5
4) Dutch dossier from 2009 referred two female children until age 3, with features in health status
5) Italian dossier from 2010 referred a child, female, to 3 years old, with features on health status
6) U.S. dossier from 2010 referred a waiting child (#478) with a profile on the MOJ site
7) U.S. dossier from 2011 referred a waiting child (#992) with a profile on the MOJ site
8) Swedish dossier from 2011 referred a waiting child (#1215) with a profile on the MOJ site
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Viviane- do you know if this is right? I am thinking if the child had" a profile on the MOJ site" he/she was on the SN list we all have access too on the site, if it says "features on health status" he/she has a special need(s), but is not on the public list, and if it says nothing about health he/she is considered a healthy referral. I know you check and post this often so I thought you would know. We are waiting 10 months now. I love to see that they are moving forward with referrals, even if it seems the US referrals are referral requests.
ReplyDeleteI don't know for sure, but my interpretation is the same as yours. I think if it says "with features in health status," it's a child with mild or correctable SN who was not profiled on the public MOJ list. Sometimes it also says "with a family history" which must mean that parents or grandparents might have had an intellectual disability or psychological disorder etc., but the child is not known to have the same.
ReplyDelete